2005 Nissan Armada vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1334 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 377 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 120. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Armada | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Armada | 120 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 84.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2344 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 45 L |
