2005 Nissan Armada vs. 1980 Chrysler 1609
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1244 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 1609. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (144 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Armada | 1980 Chrysler 1609 | |
Make | Nissan | Chrysler |
Model | Armada | 1609 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 144 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2344 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2670 mm |