2005 Nissan Armada vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1198 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Armada | 1982 Plymouth Caravelle | |
| Make | Nissan | Plymouth |
| Model | Armada | Caravelle |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2388 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2630 mm |
