2005 Nissan Armada vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1413 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (187 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Armada | 1993 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Armada | Clio |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2388 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1400 mm |
