2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1014 kg more than 2004 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Armada | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Armada | 75 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2388 kg | 1374 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 65 L |