2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2004 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Skoda Fabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Skoda Fabia would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 2004 Skoda Fabia. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2004 Skoda Fabia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1133 kg more than 2004 Skoda Fabia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Skoda Fabia. (310 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Armada | 2004 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Nissan | Skoda |
Model | Armada | Fabia |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 310 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 19.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2388 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 55 L |