2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2006 Audi A3
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2006 Audi A3. (247 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 778 kg more than 2006 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi A3. (321 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Armada | 2006 Audi A3 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Armada | A3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 3189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 321 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 95.9 mm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2388 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 60 L |