2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2006 Rover 25
To start off, 2006 Rover 25 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2006 Rover 25. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1283 kg more than 2006 Rover 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 25. (123 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Armada | 2006 Rover 25 | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | Armada | 25 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2388 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 50 L |
