2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (256 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75.
Because 2005 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (245 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Armada | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Armada | 75 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 522 Nm | 245 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 13.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 65 L |