2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1069 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Armada | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Armada | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 15.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2344 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 55 L |