2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2009 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (313 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 946 kg more than 2009 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Armada. (385 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Armada | 2009 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | Armada | Armada |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 5552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 313 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 385 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2388 kg | 1442 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1970 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 106 L |
