2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (121 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Armada | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | Armada | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 72.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 81.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 2700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 1870 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 33 L |
