2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2010 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2010 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2010 Saab 03-Sep. (207 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2010 Saab 03-Sep.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saab 03-Sep. (299 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Armada | 2010 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Nissan | Saab |
| Model | Armada | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 299 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4689 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1529 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2675 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 62 L |
