2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2012 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi TT. (250 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Armada | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Armada | TT |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 60 L |