2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2012 BMW 750
To start off, 2012 BMW 750 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 750 (400 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 750 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 248 kg more than 2012 BMW 750.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 750 (609 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2012 BMW 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Armada | 2012 BMW 750 | |
Make | Nissan | BMW |
Model | Armada | 750 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 609 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2388 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1479 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 82 L |