2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Fiat 500
To start off, 2013 Fiat 500 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2013 Fiat 500. (101 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2013 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1282 kg more than 2013 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Fiat 500. (133 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Fiat 500.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Armada | 2013 Fiat 500 | |
Make | Nissan | Fiat |
Model | Armada | 500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 133 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2388 kg | 1106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3547 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1627 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 40 L |