2005 Nissan Armada vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost weights approximately 19 kg more than 2005 Nissan Armada.
Because 2005 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost (780 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Armada | 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost | |
Make | Nissan | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Armada | Ghost |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 780 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2476 kg | 2495 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 5569 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1948 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3465 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 20.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 82 L |