2005 Nissan Cima vs. 1966 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2005 Nissan Cima is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Cima weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1966 Steyr Haflinger.
Because 1966 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Nissan Cima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Cima | 1966 Steyr Haflinger | |
| Make | Nissan | Steyr |
| Model | Cima | Haflinger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 4500 cc | 641 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 2840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1360 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1750 mm |
