2005 Nissan Cima vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 2005 Nissan Cima is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Cima | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cima | 240 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4500 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |