2005 Nissan Cima vs. 2011 Volvo C70
To start off, 2011 Volvo C70 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Cima weights approximately 30 kg more than 2011 Volvo C70.
Because 2005 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan Cima has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan Cima will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Cima | 2011 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Cima | C70 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4500 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4615 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
