2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 1964 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1964 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 225 kg more than 1964 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Zodiac. (191 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 1964 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Hardbody | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1270 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 45 L |
