2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 1964 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1964 Plymouth Valiant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Hardbody | 1964 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Nissan | Plymouth |
Model | Hardbody | Valiant |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |