2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 1969 Triumph 1300
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (168 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 1300. (61 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 916 kg more than 1969 Triumph 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Triumph 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (278 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Hardbody | 1969 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Hardbody | 1300 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3275 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91.5 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1831 kg | 915 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 53 L |