2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 351 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Hardbody | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3275 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1831 kg | 1480 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |
