2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 1996 Opel Omega
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (145 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1996 Opel Omega. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1996 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Opel Omega weights approximately 72 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (208 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Opel Omega. (178 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Hardbody | 1996 Opel Omega | |
Make | Nissan | Opel |
Model | Hardbody | Omega |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2389 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 208 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1430 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |