2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 238 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2000 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Nissan | Opel |
| Model | Hardbody | Omega |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1733 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 75 L |
