2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo V40 would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo V40 (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 100 kg more than 2000 Volvo V40.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo V40 (300 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Hardbody | V40 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2663 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1395 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |