2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2004 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 155 kg more than 2004 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen Xsara (255 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2004 Citroen Xsara | |
| Make | Nissan | Citroen |
| Model | Hardbody | Xsara |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1340 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 54 L |
