2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (158 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 75 weights approximately 94 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (208 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Hardbody | 75 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2389 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 208 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1452 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.5 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 65 L |