2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2006 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2006 Smart Roadster is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2006 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 525 kg more than 2006 Smart Roadster. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart Roadster. (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2006 Smart Roadster | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | Hardbody | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 970 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 35 L |
