2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2007 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2007 Suzuki Reno is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2007 Suzuki Reno. (127 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2007 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 430 kg more than 2007 Suzuki Reno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Suzuki Reno. (179 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2007 Suzuki Reno | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Hardbody | Reno |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1065 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 55 L |
