2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2008 Rover 45
To start off, 2008 Rover 45 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2008 Rover 45. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 45. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 315 kg more than 2008 Rover 45. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 45. (139 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2008 Rover 45 | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | Hardbody | 45 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1180 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 55 L |
