2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (168 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (278 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Hardbody | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3275 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |