2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 307 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (368 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | Hardbody | STS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2663 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 368 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1802 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2957 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 64 L |