2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2010 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2010 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler Sebring (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (168 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chrysler Sebring. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (278 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chrysler Sebring. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2010 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Nissan | Chrysler |
Model | Hardbody | Sebring |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3275 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 64 L |