2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Hardbody | Colorado |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2389 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |