2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2010 Hummer H3
To start off, 2010 Hummer H3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 3,651 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hummer H3 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hummer H3 weights approximately 705 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Hummer H3 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2010 Hummer H3 | |
| Make | Nissan | Hummer |
| Model | Hardbody | H3 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 3651 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 328 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 2200 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 87 L |
