2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Nissan | Citroen |
| Model | Hardbody | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 380 Nm |
