2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2011 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2011 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Mustang (412 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Mustang weights approximately 192 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Mustang (528 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2011 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Hardbody | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 412 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 528 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1687 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 61 L |
