2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2012 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Avenger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Avenger (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 44 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Avenger (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2012 Dodge Avenger | |
| Make | Nissan | Dodge |
| Model | Hardbody | Avenger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 225 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1539 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2766 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 64 L |
