2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2012 Ford Flex
To start off, 2012 Ford Flex is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Flex weights approximately 533 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Flex (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2012 Ford Flex | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Hardbody | Flex |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 262 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 336 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 2028 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2995 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |
