2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2012 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2012 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 501 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota 4Runner (376 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2012 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Hardbody | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2663 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1996 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 87 L |