2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (145 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 212 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (373 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (208 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan Hardbody has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Nissan Hardbody 2013 Cadillac ATS
Make Nissan Cadillac
Model Hardbody ATS
Year Released 2005 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2389 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 145 HP 317 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 208 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.2:1 11.5
Acceleration 0-100mph 12.4 seconds 6 seconds
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1358 kg 1570 kg
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2776 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 61 L