2005 Nissan Micra vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Nissan Micra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 188 kg more than 2005 Nissan Micra.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Micra | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Nissan | Riley |
Model | Micra | RM A |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 1386 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1047 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2870 mm |