2005 Nissan Micra vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Nissan Micra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Micra (88 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Micra weights approximately 543 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Micra (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Micra | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Micra | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1386 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1047 kg | 504 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 66 L |
