2005 Nissan Micra vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Nissan Micra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Micra (88 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Micra weights approximately 277 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Micra (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Micra | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Nissan | Zastava |
| Model | Micra | 102 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1386 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1047 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2160 mm |
