2005 Nissan Micra vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 2005 Nissan Micra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 63 kg more than 2005 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Proton 400 has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan Micra has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan Micra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Proton 400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Micra | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Nissan | Proton |
Model | Micra | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1386 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1047 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2510 mm |