2005 Nissan Micra vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Micra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Micra would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Micra (88 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Micra | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Micra | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1386 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2490 mm |