2005 Nissan Micra vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Micra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Micra would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Micra (88 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Micra | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Nissan | Nissan |
Model | Micra | Pixo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1386 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 172 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.9 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2360 mm |