2005 Nissan Murano vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2005 Nissan Murano is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Murano (245 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Murano weights approximately 789 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Murano (323 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Murano | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Murano | 220 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3507 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1804 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 45 L |